HARLEY66
Sedicioso
If you choose not to read it, then do not: Marca awaits;
jojojojojo :XX:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Nota: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you choose not to read it, then do not: Marca awaits;
Dear Mssrs Abraham and Valmont,
You have made some critiques of my article to which I feel justified in responding:
1. I am not a secessionist, I am an American; learn the difference;
2. I don't see how my analysis can be said to support secession. For one thing, I explicitly disclaim at the beginning any support for or against the arguments of either side. For another, I think the conclusions I draw are rather more disheartening than otherwise;
3. I call myself an economist because that is what the university from which I graduated calls me. If you have an issue with it, take it up with them;
4. In my life, I have been an entrepreneur, and met with both success and failure. I have also served my country in the Armed Forces. It's called experience: most people value it;
5. I offer a methodological framework for conflict analysis, a contribution I have not found in any literature or studies on the situation by either side in the Catalonia debate. Like any construct dealing with future events, it inevitably requires the application of probabilities. Furthermore, as secessions don't happen every week, the use of personal criteria for setting those estimates is both legitimate and widely accepted. If you have a crystal ball that grants you perfect foresight, please lend it to me: I'd like to spend a week in Vegas;
6. You are justified in disagreeing with both the outcomes and the probabilities that I assign, but no, I did not "pull them out my ass" as you so charmingly suggest. I have given what I consider to be sufficient and considered reasons - if you had gotten beyond the introduction you might have come to them;
7. You criticize that my work is reproduced in Vilaweb. They are free to do so as long as they cite it as original work of mine. I have been published in other respectable venues, both digital and print, under the same conditions: but be clear that the work is my own, not under commission by Vilaweb or anyone else. If you choose not to read it, then do not: Marca awaits;
8. Finally, I a happy to have a civilized discussion with anyone on any topic using reason and logic. Personal attacks and snide aspersions, like yours, are contemptible. I find them to usually be the refuge of fanaticism, intolerance or ignorance. Take your pick.
I remain, sir, yours,
Fernando Betancor
En el Este están acostumbrados a jugar duro. En Freedom-for-Catalonia, a soltar blando a poco que se les plante cara.
Dear Mssrs Abraham and Valmont,
You have made some critiques of my article to which I feel justified in responding:
1. I am not a secessionist, I am an American; learn the difference;
2. I don't see how my analysis can be said to support secession. For one thing, I explicitly disclaim at the beginning any support for or against the arguments of either side. For another, I think the conclusions I draw are rather more disheartening than otherwise;
3. I call myself an economist because that is what the university from which I graduated calls me. If you have an issue with it, take it up with them;
4. In my life, I have been an entrepreneur, and met with both success and failure. I have also served my country in the Armed Forces. It's called experience: most people value it;
5. I offer a methodological framework for conflict analysis, a contribution I have not found in any literature or studies on the situation by either side in the Catalonia debate. Like any construct dealing with future events, it inevitably requires the application of probabilities. Furthermore, as secessions don't happen every week, the use of personal criteria for setting those estimates is both legitimate and widely accepted. If you have a crystal ball that grants you perfect foresight, please lend it to me: I'd like to spend a week in Vegas;
6. You are justified in disagreeing with both the outcomes and the probabilities that I assign, but no, I did not "pull them out my ass" as you so charmingly suggest. I have given what I consider to be sufficient and considered reasons - if you had gotten beyond the introduction you might have come to them;
7. You criticize that my work is reproduced in Vilaweb. They are free to do so as long as they cite it as original work of mine. I have been published in other respectable venues, both digital and print, under the same conditions: but be clear that the work is my own, not under commission by Vilaweb or anyone else. If you choose not to read it, then do not: Marca awaits;
8. Finally, I a happy to have a civilized discussion with anyone on any topic using reason and logic. Personal attacks and snide aspersions, like yours, are contemptible. I find them to usually be the refuge of fanaticism, intolerance or ignorance. Take your pick.
I remain, sir, yours,
Fernando Betancor
Dear Mssrs Abraham and Valmont,
You have made some critiques of my article to which I feel justified in responding:
1. I am not a secessionist, I am an American; learn the difference;
2. I don't see how my analysis can be said to support secession. For one thing, I explicitly disclaim at the beginning any support for or against the arguments of either side. For another, I think the conclusions I draw are rather more disheartening than otherwise;
3. I call myself an economist because that is what the university from which I graduated calls me. If you have an issue with it, take it up with them;
4. In my life, I have been an entrepreneur, and met with both success and failure. I have also served my country in the Armed Forces. It's called experience: most people value it;
5. I offer a methodological framework for conflict analysis, a contribution I have not found in any literature or studies on the situation by either side in the Catalonia debate. Like any construct dealing with future events, it inevitably requires the application of probabilities. Furthermore, as secessions don't happen every week, the use of personal criteria for setting those estimates is both legitimate and widely accepted. If you have a crystal ball that grants you perfect foresight, please lend it to me: I'd like to spend a week in Vegas;
6. You are justified in disagreeing with both the outcomes and the probabilities that I assign, but no, I did not "pull them out my ass" as you so charmingly suggest. I have given what I consider to be sufficient and considered reasons - if you had gotten beyond the introduction you might have come to them;
7. You criticize that my work is reproduced in Vilaweb. They are free to do so as long as they cite it as original work of mine. I have been published in other respectable venues, both digital and print, under the same conditions: but be clear that the work is my own, not under commission by Vilaweb or anyone else. If you choose not to read it, then do not: Marca awaits;
8. Finally, I a happy to have a civilized discussion with anyone on any topic using reason and logic. Personal attacks and snide aspersions, like yours, are contemptible. I find them to usually be the refuge of fanaticism, intolerance or ignorance. Take your pick.
I remain, sir, yours,
Fernando Betancor
Perhaps Mr. Rajoy is praying for a Spanish victory in this summer's World Cup. That appears to be the only circumstance that could save the integrity of the Spanish state.
Echando un vistazo a su Twitter
https://twitter.com/fdbetancor
la persona que dice que "él es americano, no secesionista" se permite el lujo de colgar vídeos sobre el CONFLICTO SECRETO (literalmente) catalán.
Aquí la foto del amigo. Por cierto, para los posibles LDKs que le aplaudirían con las orejas, es un supuesto valedor del liberalismo económico, y otras cosas que a los de ERC o las CUP les debería dar urticaria, y tal.
También habla de que "se acaban las opciones para mantener España unida", y que "Artur Más no tenía alternativas", e incluso (atención) dice que la única posibilidad de mantener España unida es que gane el Mundial:
PEDAZO de analista mundial. Sus miles y mi...ochenta y seis seguidores en Twitter tienen que devorar cada una de sus palabras.
Abril parece ser su mes de fomentar el nacionalismo tal y como lo entiende CiU, sin pudor ninguno. Varios artículos al respecto. Y viendo que son lo ÚNICO que escribe que recibe la más mínima atención, dad por hecho que habrá más.
De algo hay que comer, ¿eh señor Betancor?
Pero si es el memo más petulante y se cree sabio.
Entrar en un foro de habla española y colgar un texto en inglés ya es ridículo.
Seguro que está el tipo buscando con google temas donde se le mencione para rellenar su currículo.
---------- Post added 24-abr-2014 at 13:31 ----------
Fernando Betancor es ''americano''?
El apellido es de origen francés Betancourt castellanizado en Canarias solo a medias.
Mucho glamour trae en tipejo si hubiera colgao el texto en francés de la Martinica.
Las personas que llevan la raya al medio no son de fiar.
Que lo se yo.
Parece que lo que se trata es intentar descalificar mediante insultos como es habitual en este foro. ¿O no?
No me negara que el tío en feo con avaricia, o no?
jorobar, este llevaría no pocas palos en el cole ...: