Marpozuelo
Madmaxista
- Desde
- 23 Mar 2012
- Mensajes
- 8.992
- Reputación
- 16.178
Un conservador derechista de su época. En esos años supongo que es lo que pensarían los conservadores.
Churchill: ¿héroe o criminal de guerra?
- Autor del tema peste bubónica
- Fecha de inicio
En este foro no hay término medio.
O crees que Churchill era un campeón de las libertades y la democracia, como el orate de Aznar.
O que era un criptocomunista que recibía ordenes selladas de los rabínos, escritas con sangre de niños sacrificados.
O crees que Churchill era un campeón de las libertades y la democracia, como el orate de Aznar.
O que era un criptocomunista que recibía ordenes selladas de los rabínos, escritas con sangre de niños sacrificados.
Taliván Hortográfico
ПРЕД P И B ВИНАГИ СЕ ИЗПИСВА M
Hombre, pues claro que hay foreros que opinamos términos medios, de esto y de casi todo. Pero, en general, los términos medios hacen menos ruido. 
AntiFax
Baneado
- Desde
- 18 Feb 2015
- Mensajes
- 900
- Reputación
- 875
Veamos un poco qué tipo de solidez tenían las convicciones políticas de este arquetipo de la noble Albión, indiscutible artífice del mundo moderno.
En 1920 Churchill estaba retirado de la vida pública luego del desastre de Gallípoli donde su crasa ineptitud mandó a la fin a 100.000 soldados ingleses.
El escribía en distintos diarios londinenses y en uno de esos artículos, titulado ‘Zionism versus Bolshevism’, publicado en Illustrated Sunday Herald del 8 de febrero de 1920, él decía:
'Este movimiento entre los alubio*s no es nuevo.
Desde los días de Spartacus-Weishaupt a los de Karl Marx, y Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburgo, y Emma Goldman , esta conspiración mundial para el derrocamiento de la civilización y para la reconstitución de la sociedad, de malevolencia envidiosa y una igualdad imposible, ha sido cada vez mayor.
Jugó, como un escritor moderno, la señora Webster, ha mostrado tan hábilmente, una parte definitivamente reconocible en la tragedia de la Revolución francesa.
Ha sido la causa principal de cada movimiento subversivo durante el siglo XIX; y ahora, por fin esta banda de personalidades extraordinarias del submundo de las grandes ciudades de Europa y América han agarrado al pueblo ruso por el pelo de la barba y se han convertido prácticamente en los maestros indiscutibles de ese enorme imperio.”
¿Hará falta aclarar a quienes se estaba refiriendo...?
Pero menos de 20 años después, en 1938, cuando tenía 64 años, Churchill había dilapidado la fortuna familiar, estaba casi en la ruina y enfrentaba la perspectiva de la venta forzosa de su lujosa casa de campo en Chartwell.
Pero he aquí que en esa hora adversa, dos hombres llegaron en su auxilio:
Uno era Henry Strakosch, un alubio* multimillonario que había adquirido una fortuna especulando en empresas mineras sudafricanas después que su familia había emigrado a ese país desde Austria. Strakosch entregó a Churchill un "préstamo" de £ 150.000, justo a tiempo para salvar a su finca de la casa de subastas. En los años que siguieron, Strakosch sirvió como el invisible asesor y confidente de Churchill.
El otro, era Sir Bernard Waley Cohenactivista sionista y presidente de la Cámara de empresarios organizados por el Consejo de Diputados judíos del Parlamento.
Este hombre creó en julio de 1936, un fondo especial de 2.000.000 libras para el Focus, el grupo de presión encargado de “orientar” a Churchill en la necesidad de aniquilar a Alemania y el poder de los nazis.
Así se mueven las fichas en los tableros de la historia.
Los mismos que levantaban a Hitler, creaban de la nada, a su antagonista.
Y se sentaron en la platea a ver los resultados...
Bernard Waley-Cohen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Henry Strakosch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
En 1920 Churchill estaba retirado de la vida pública luego del desastre de Gallípoli donde su crasa ineptitud mandó a la fin a 100.000 soldados ingleses.
El escribía en distintos diarios londinenses y en uno de esos artículos, titulado ‘Zionism versus Bolshevism’, publicado en Illustrated Sunday Herald del 8 de febrero de 1920, él decía:
'Este movimiento entre los alubio*s no es nuevo.
Desde los días de Spartacus-Weishaupt a los de Karl Marx, y Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxemburgo, y Emma Goldman , esta conspiración mundial para el derrocamiento de la civilización y para la reconstitución de la sociedad, de malevolencia envidiosa y una igualdad imposible, ha sido cada vez mayor.
Jugó, como un escritor moderno, la señora Webster, ha mostrado tan hábilmente, una parte definitivamente reconocible en la tragedia de la Revolución francesa.
Ha sido la causa principal de cada movimiento subversivo durante el siglo XIX; y ahora, por fin esta banda de personalidades extraordinarias del submundo de las grandes ciudades de Europa y América han agarrado al pueblo ruso por el pelo de la barba y se han convertido prácticamente en los maestros indiscutibles de ese enorme imperio.”
¿Hará falta aclarar a quienes se estaba refiriendo...?
Pero menos de 20 años después, en 1938, cuando tenía 64 años, Churchill había dilapidado la fortuna familiar, estaba casi en la ruina y enfrentaba la perspectiva de la venta forzosa de su lujosa casa de campo en Chartwell.
Pero he aquí que en esa hora adversa, dos hombres llegaron en su auxilio:
Uno era Henry Strakosch, un alubio* multimillonario que había adquirido una fortuna especulando en empresas mineras sudafricanas después que su familia había emigrado a ese país desde Austria. Strakosch entregó a Churchill un "préstamo" de £ 150.000, justo a tiempo para salvar a su finca de la casa de subastas. En los años que siguieron, Strakosch sirvió como el invisible asesor y confidente de Churchill.
El otro, era Sir Bernard Waley Cohenactivista sionista y presidente de la Cámara de empresarios organizados por el Consejo de Diputados judíos del Parlamento.
Este hombre creó en julio de 1936, un fondo especial de 2.000.000 libras para el Focus, el grupo de presión encargado de “orientar” a Churchill en la necesidad de aniquilar a Alemania y el poder de los nazis.
Así se mueven las fichas en los tableros de la historia.
Los mismos que levantaban a Hitler, creaban de la nada, a su antagonista.
Y se sentaron en la platea a ver los resultados...
Bernard Waley-Cohen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Henry Strakosch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Última edición:
Lo es. Ahora, pretender que es el mayor criminal de guerra de la WWII, y sobre todo por encima de Hitler es de padecer esquizofrenia paranoide.
Lynx
Madmaxista
- Desde
- 28 Dic 2013
- Mensajes
- 7.443
- Reputación
- 7.901
Winston Churchill's relative's descent into Nazism exposed by documents | Daily Mail Online
---------- Post added 30-ago-2015 at 10:06 ----------
Were Queen Victoria and Prince Albert both illegitimate?
A film premiered last night shows the many plots to kill the young Queen Victoria. But her biographer reveals the real story behind this remarkable couple is even more sensational.
For the truth is that, if anyone had succeeded in killing Queen Victoria before she gave birth, it is highly questionable whether the British monarchy would have survived at all.
Not one of her grandfather George III's fat, dissolute sons had managed to produce a robust heir. Her uncle George IV's daughter, Princess Charlotte, died aged 21 in 1817.
King William IV, George IV's younger brother who inherited the throne, had ten children by the actress Mrs Jordan.
Unfortunately, although they were a strapping, vigorous brood, who went on themselves to breed many an interesting descendant (such as John Julius Norwich the historian and even David Cameron who is the great-great-great-great-great-grandson of Mrs Jordan), none was legitimate.
It meant everything really hung on the dumpling-daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Kent - the princess who would become Queen Victoria.
Her father died when she was in her infancy and it is almost impossible to conceive of the paranoia in court circles when she was young that she - and therefore the monarchy - might not survive.
Her childhood was a nightmare - her mother kept Victoria under more or less constant supervision. Even aged 18 she was still not allowed to go up and down stairs without someone holding her hand, and all her food was tasted for poison before she ate it. For a strong-minded girl and young woman, the constraints were all but intolerable.
Victoria was kept prisoner by her mother in Kensington Palace. They shared a bedroom until the day she became Queen. She was supervised at every turn either by the Duchess of Kent or by her Governess, the Baroness Lehzen.
She was never allowed out to play on her own. In fact, for Victoria, even to have visitors was all but unknown. Like a princess in a German fairy story, she was kept immured in case someone tried to kill her - there was, after all, an air of revolution in Europe and the immense poverty after the Napoleonic Wars made her an even more likely target.
Victoria was all but bursting with understandable frustration at the hour-by-hour supervision she was forced to endure.
Moreover, the future Queen was dominated by the evil genius of Sir John Conroy, Comptroller of the Duchess's household. Members of William IV's court joked about the 'Conroyal Family' at Kensington Palace, and in later life Queen Victoria told the Duke of Wellington that one reason she hated Sir John was that she had witnessed 'some familiarities' between the Irish soldier and her mother. Victoria was an intelligent - if maddening - woman. Surely she guessed, or antiestéticared, that she was Conroy's daughter? The old Duke of Kent, her supposed father, was well 'past it' by the time Victoria was conceived. Moreover, there is the family's curious medical history which we now know, and which surely requires some explanation.
Her grandfather, George III, notoriously suffered from the condition known as porphyria, whose symptoms included madness, flatulence, itchy skin and discoloured urine. When the present Queen's sister, Princess Margaret, saw the film of Alan Bennett's play The Madness Of King George, she asked: 'Isn't it hereditary?'
Well, the answer is, yes it is, yet not one of Queen Victoria's descendants has ever been recorded as having it.
There is another curious medical fact. We know Queen Victoria passed on haemophilia to her descendants. Seventeen generations of the family on Queen Victoria's mother's side have been investigated by scientists at the Royal Society of Medicine. Not one has haemophilia. Nor was there any haemophilia in the Royal Family before Victoria, so the finger really does point to Queen Victoria's father having been someone other than the Duke of Kent.
It must have been the awful Sir John Conroy with that haemophiliac gene. The new film rightly shows his attempts to get Victoria to sign a deed making him the Regent, and her doughty resistance. Did he actually, as in the film, use physical violence on her?
Strangely enough, there are interesting medical details on the side of Prince Albert, the German cousin Queen Victoria married, which suggest that he, too, may have been illegitimate. His mother had been dismissed from the court of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha for having an affair with the Jewish chamberlain, the Baron von Mayern, a cultivated, musical, intelligent man.
Both Albert's stupid, lecherous, drunken and supposed father, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg, and his brother Ernst had hereditary syphilis, but there is no trace of this in the life of Albert who, like the Baron von Mayern, was intelligent, musical and cultivated. Unlike his own Saxe-Coburg relations, he was also a pillar of family rectitude and marital loyalty.
There were also the assassins. It would only have taken one accurate assassin to bring the line more or less to an end. I say more or less, since the crown would have passed to Ernest Augustus Duke of Cumberland, later King of Hanover, and it is hard to imagine that the English monarchy would have survived.
Albert - the man who taught her so much.
In the opening years of her reign, when she was an unmarried teenager, she made some silly mistakes, thinking for example that she could insult the Tory Prime Minister, Sir Robert Peel, by refusing his suggestions that a few members of his political persuasion should be represented at court.
She was booed in public and someone cruelly called out 'Mrs Melbourne' when she went to the opera with 'Lord M', the Whig Prime Minister Lord Melbourne, whom she adored in a besotted teenaged-crush.
Melbourne, however, was a man of the old Regency days, whose aristocratic hauteur made him a charming dinner companion but a rotten adviser about the condition of England in the late 1830s.
Victoria was going to rule over a country which was the first great industrial power in the world. She needed to know about mill towns and coal mines and railways. She needed to be sympathetic to the aspirations of the middle classes.
Albert, when he had married her, had great difficulty persuading his headstrong young Queen to adapt to the times, however obsessed she was with him sexually. But eventually he was able to persuade her to mould the constitutional monarchy to the changing politics of Britain.
Robert Peel was the inventor of One Nation Toryism. His concern for the middle class, his desire to expand the franchise, and his worries about the conditions of the working classes were shared by Albert.
The eldest child of Victoria and Albert, Crown Princess Vicky, became the mother of German Emperor Kaiser Wilhelm II, whose militarist policies and determination to build up the German navy led to the outbreak of World War I. Victoria's letters to her daughter, when Vicky went to Germany and got married, reveal the extent of Prince Albert's vision of a modern federalist Germany, based on democracy.
It is one of the great political tragedies of history that Prince Albert died aged 42 and was unable to influence events in Germany and to control his mad grandson Kaiser Bill.
Were Queen Victoria and Prince Albert both illegitimate? | Daily Mail Online
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oOatbFq1G_Y/TvAQAa1nyzI/AAAAAAAAEds/_EjFky7gmw0/s400/lionel%2Bnathan%2Bde%2Brothschild.jpg[IMG]
Adolf Hitler’s secret grandfather, Lionel Nathan de Rothschild 22.11.1808-3.6.1879. Not many photos around in the days of his youth. He was later the first British Jewish MP. At the time that he fathered Alois (7.6.1837-3.1.1903) with Maria Schiklgruber (1836), he was seventeen years old.
Adolf Hitler was the son of Alois, who was the illegitimate son of Lionel Nathan de Rothschild, who later became the first Jewish MP in the British Parliament. At age 17 in 1836, he fathered Alois with a sewing maid Maria Schiklgruber, while staying as a guest of the Frankenbergers near Vienna. Winston Churchill was the illegitimate son of Edward 7th, and was not the son of Lord Randolph Churchill. There is also doubt as to the fatherhood of Edward 7th. Is it possible that Churchill and Hitler were really first cousins?
What evidence can be found?
Alois Hitler. Historians have always struggled with the problem of working out who his father was. His mother Maria Schiklgruber was a sewing maid at the Frankenbergers, a rich Jewish Viennese family. She fell pregnant and was sent home, but was supported financially right through Alois’ childhood from an unknown quarter. It was assumed the money came from the Frankenbergers, but the condition of the financial support was her silence as to who the real father was.
Later attempts to say that Alois real father was his stepfather, named Hitler, were all about securing promotion with the Customs service, and not true.
Adolf was also favoured with financial support when Alois, Maria and Klara, his mother all died quite young. He was later trained in London by the Tavistock Institute using the name Edmund Hitler in 1912. His presence in Britain has always been explained as a visit to relatives.
The most likely explanation, given later events, is that Maria was the victim of an occult rape while working at the Frankenbergers, with a visiting Rothschild the perpetrator (Lionel Nathan Rothschild), the family then paying Maria to buy her silence, and later recruiting Adolf to be trained as a British agent at Tavistock.
Greg Hallett’s book ‘Hitler Was A British Agent’ contains the full description of what happened, obtained (he claims) by Hallett from secret service sources. I left my copy in the UK, and have asked a relative to check the story before I reproduce it in full on here. Meanwhile this is a radio interview repeating some of the startling things Hallett says in the book.
Churchill was the illegitimate son of King Edward 7th and Jenny Jerome Churchill. Edward 7th, Hallett claims, was the illegitimate son of Queen Victoria and Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Queen Victoria, he claims, was also the daughter of Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Churchill’s grandfather and great grandfather were the same person.
[b]The problem with this claim is that there two Nathan Mayer de Rothschilds, one living from 1777 to 1836. The other from 1840 to 1915. Edward 7th was born in 1841, and so could not possibly have been fathered by either of the two Nathan Mayer de Rothschilds. Queen Victoria, however, could well have been fathered by the earlier Nathan Mayer, as Hallett suggests.[/b] She was most likely illegitimate as written in The Daily Mail.
[url=http://tapnewswire.com/2011/11/ww2-a-farce-hitler-and-churchill-were-cousins/]WW2 A Farce. Hitler And Churchill Were Cousins… |[/url]
---------- Post added 30-ago-2015 at 10:06 ----------
Were Queen Victoria and Prince Albert both illegitimate?
A film premiered last night shows the many plots to kill the young Queen Victoria. But her biographer reveals the real story behind this remarkable couple is even more sensational.
For the truth is that, if anyone had succeeded in killing Queen Victoria before she gave birth, it is highly questionable whether the British monarchy would have survived at all.
Not one of her grandfather George III's fat, dissolute sons had managed to produce a robust heir. Her uncle George IV's daughter, Princess Charlotte, died aged 21 in 1817.
King William IV, George IV's younger brother who inherited the throne, had ten children by the actress Mrs Jordan.
Unfortunately, although they were a strapping, vigorous brood, who went on themselves to breed many an interesting descendant (such as John Julius Norwich the historian and even David Cameron who is the great-great-great-great-great-grandson of Mrs Jordan), none was legitimate.
It meant everything really hung on the dumpling-daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Kent - the princess who would become Queen Victoria.
Her father died when she was in her infancy and it is almost impossible to conceive of the paranoia in court circles when she was young that she - and therefore the monarchy - might not survive.
Her childhood was a nightmare - her mother kept Victoria under more or less constant supervision. Even aged 18 she was still not allowed to go up and down stairs without someone holding her hand, and all her food was tasted for poison before she ate it. For a strong-minded girl and young woman, the constraints were all but intolerable.
Victoria was kept prisoner by her mother in Kensington Palace. They shared a bedroom until the day she became Queen. She was supervised at every turn either by the Duchess of Kent or by her Governess, the Baroness Lehzen.
She was never allowed out to play on her own. In fact, for Victoria, even to have visitors was all but unknown. Like a princess in a German fairy story, she was kept immured in case someone tried to kill her - there was, after all, an air of revolution in Europe and the immense poverty after the Napoleonic Wars made her an even more likely target.
Victoria was all but bursting with understandable frustration at the hour-by-hour supervision she was forced to endure.
Moreover, the future Queen was dominated by the evil genius of Sir John Conroy, Comptroller of the Duchess's household. Members of William IV's court joked about the 'Conroyal Family' at Kensington Palace, and in later life Queen Victoria told the Duke of Wellington that one reason she hated Sir John was that she had witnessed 'some familiarities' between the Irish soldier and her mother. Victoria was an intelligent - if maddening - woman. Surely she guessed, or antiestéticared, that she was Conroy's daughter? The old Duke of Kent, her supposed father, was well 'past it' by the time Victoria was conceived. Moreover, there is the family's curious medical history which we now know, and which surely requires some explanation.
Her grandfather, George III, notoriously suffered from the condition known as porphyria, whose symptoms included madness, flatulence, itchy skin and discoloured urine. When the present Queen's sister, Princess Margaret, saw the film of Alan Bennett's play The Madness Of King George, she asked: 'Isn't it hereditary?'
Well, the answer is, yes it is, yet not one of Queen Victoria's descendants has ever been recorded as having it.
There is another curious medical fact. We know Queen Victoria passed on haemophilia to her descendants. Seventeen generations of the family on Queen Victoria's mother's side have been investigated by scientists at the Royal Society of Medicine. Not one has haemophilia. Nor was there any haemophilia in the Royal Family before Victoria, so the finger really does point to Queen Victoria's father having been someone other than the Duke of Kent.
It must have been the awful Sir John Conroy with that haemophiliac gene. The new film rightly shows his attempts to get Victoria to sign a deed making him the Regent, and her doughty resistance. Did he actually, as in the film, use physical violence on her?
Strangely enough, there are interesting medical details on the side of Prince Albert, the German cousin Queen Victoria married, which suggest that he, too, may have been illegitimate. His mother had been dismissed from the court of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha for having an affair with the Jewish chamberlain, the Baron von Mayern, a cultivated, musical, intelligent man.
Both Albert's stupid, lecherous, drunken and supposed father, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg, and his brother Ernst had hereditary syphilis, but there is no trace of this in the life of Albert who, like the Baron von Mayern, was intelligent, musical and cultivated. Unlike his own Saxe-Coburg relations, he was also a pillar of family rectitude and marital loyalty.
There were also the assassins. It would only have taken one accurate assassin to bring the line more or less to an end. I say more or less, since the crown would have passed to Ernest Augustus Duke of Cumberland, later King of Hanover, and it is hard to imagine that the English monarchy would have survived.
Albert - the man who taught her so much.
In the opening years of her reign, when she was an unmarried teenager, she made some silly mistakes, thinking for example that she could insult the Tory Prime Minister, Sir Robert Peel, by refusing his suggestions that a few members of his political persuasion should be represented at court.
She was booed in public and someone cruelly called out 'Mrs Melbourne' when she went to the opera with 'Lord M', the Whig Prime Minister Lord Melbourne, whom she adored in a besotted teenaged-crush.
Melbourne, however, was a man of the old Regency days, whose aristocratic hauteur made him a charming dinner companion but a rotten adviser about the condition of England in the late 1830s.
Victoria was going to rule over a country which was the first great industrial power in the world. She needed to know about mill towns and coal mines and railways. She needed to be sympathetic to the aspirations of the middle classes.
Albert, when he had married her, had great difficulty persuading his headstrong young Queen to adapt to the times, however obsessed she was with him sexually. But eventually he was able to persuade her to mould the constitutional monarchy to the changing politics of Britain.
Robert Peel was the inventor of One Nation Toryism. His concern for the middle class, his desire to expand the franchise, and his worries about the conditions of the working classes were shared by Albert.
The eldest child of Victoria and Albert, Crown Princess Vicky, became the mother of German Emperor Kaiser Wilhelm II, whose militarist policies and determination to build up the German navy led to the outbreak of World War I. Victoria's letters to her daughter, when Vicky went to Germany and got married, reveal the extent of Prince Albert's vision of a modern federalist Germany, based on democracy.
It is one of the great political tragedies of history that Prince Albert died aged 42 and was unable to influence events in Germany and to control his mad grandson Kaiser Bill.
Were Queen Victoria and Prince Albert both illegitimate? | Daily Mail Online
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oOatbFq1G_Y/TvAQAa1nyzI/AAAAAAAAEds/_EjFky7gmw0/s400/lionel%2Bnathan%2Bde%2Brothschild.jpg[IMG]
Adolf Hitler’s secret grandfather, Lionel Nathan de Rothschild 22.11.1808-3.6.1879. Not many photos around in the days of his youth. He was later the first British Jewish MP. At the time that he fathered Alois (7.6.1837-3.1.1903) with Maria Schiklgruber (1836), he was seventeen years old.
Adolf Hitler was the son of Alois, who was the illegitimate son of Lionel Nathan de Rothschild, who later became the first Jewish MP in the British Parliament. At age 17 in 1836, he fathered Alois with a sewing maid Maria Schiklgruber, while staying as a guest of the Frankenbergers near Vienna. Winston Churchill was the illegitimate son of Edward 7th, and was not the son of Lord Randolph Churchill. There is also doubt as to the fatherhood of Edward 7th. Is it possible that Churchill and Hitler were really first cousins?
What evidence can be found?
Alois Hitler. Historians have always struggled with the problem of working out who his father was. His mother Maria Schiklgruber was a sewing maid at the Frankenbergers, a rich Jewish Viennese family. She fell pregnant and was sent home, but was supported financially right through Alois’ childhood from an unknown quarter. It was assumed the money came from the Frankenbergers, but the condition of the financial support was her silence as to who the real father was.
Later attempts to say that Alois real father was his stepfather, named Hitler, were all about securing promotion with the Customs service, and not true.
Adolf was also favoured with financial support when Alois, Maria and Klara, his mother all died quite young. He was later trained in London by the Tavistock Institute using the name Edmund Hitler in 1912. His presence in Britain has always been explained as a visit to relatives.
The most likely explanation, given later events, is that Maria was the victim of an occult rape while working at the Frankenbergers, with a visiting Rothschild the perpetrator (Lionel Nathan Rothschild), the family then paying Maria to buy her silence, and later recruiting Adolf to be trained as a British agent at Tavistock.
Greg Hallett’s book ‘Hitler Was A British Agent’ contains the full description of what happened, obtained (he claims) by Hallett from secret service sources. I left my copy in the UK, and have asked a relative to check the story before I reproduce it in full on here. Meanwhile this is a radio interview repeating some of the startling things Hallett says in the book.
Churchill was the illegitimate son of King Edward 7th and Jenny Jerome Churchill. Edward 7th, Hallett claims, was the illegitimate son of Queen Victoria and Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Queen Victoria, he claims, was also the daughter of Nathan Mayer Rothschild. Churchill’s grandfather and great grandfather were the same person.
[b]The problem with this claim is that there two Nathan Mayer de Rothschilds, one living from 1777 to 1836. The other from 1840 to 1915. Edward 7th was born in 1841, and so could not possibly have been fathered by either of the two Nathan Mayer de Rothschilds. Queen Victoria, however, could well have been fathered by the earlier Nathan Mayer, as Hallett suggests.[/b] She was most likely illegitimate as written in The Daily Mail.
[url=http://tapnewswire.com/2011/11/ww2-a-farce-hitler-and-churchill-were-cousins/]WW2 A Farce. Hitler And Churchill Were Cousins… |[/url]
Similar threads
