Al archiduque se lo cargaron para que el Imperio cayese

Paletik "Paletov" Pasha

Dios, Empresa y Concejo
Desde
15 Jul 2011
Mensajes
67.222
Reputación
142.489
Lugar
MIEMBRO DE LOS JOVENES PACOS
Estaba en mente el proyecto de los "Estados Unidos de la Gran Austria" diseñado por el rumano tras*ilvano Aurel Popovici y que tenia la aprobacion del heredero reformista Francisco Fernando.En esta nueva configuración de equilibrio se aseguraba una mayor estabilidad dentro de las fronteras del imperio al conceder autonomia a todas las etnias que estaban bajo la egida de los Habsburgo.

800px-Greater_austria.png


Al cargarse los enemigos del imperio al Archiduque este proyecto cayo en el olvido y ademas desencadeno una sangrienta guerra que acabaria con la disolucion del Imperio que, recordemos, no se justificaba por su etnia, si no por su raza (la blanca), su fe (la catolica romana mayoritariamente) y su unidad en el destino (historia comun en la lucha contra el turco o confederacion de pueblos para protegerse de la amenaza oriental esteparia).Estos eran los componentes del cemento que unia a los diferentes pueblos del Imperio.
 
Última edición:
Está clarísimo que el asesinato tuvo como objetivos provocar una guerra mundial que destruyese los Imperios ruso, alemán y austro-hungaro. Fue organizado por el servicio secreto serbio, pero estoy seguro de que la orden de asesinarlo la dio gente mucho más poderosa que el jefe de ese servicio secreto.
 
El asesinato estuvo muy mal planificado, y fue, en último término, producto de la mala suerte y de una cierta imprudencia por parte de Francisco Fernando.
 
El propio Gavrilo Prinzip lo admitió. Él y sus cómplices no atentaron contra el archiduque porque reprimiera a los eslavos del sur, sino al contrario, porque iba a darles autonomía. Temían que eso obstaculizara su proyecto de crear la Gran Serbia.

El imperio de los Habsburgo, corazón de Europa, fue gradualmente descuartizado por sus vecinos pieza a pieza. Prusia y el Piamonte le causaron terribles heridas. Los húngaros intentaron separarse pero sin conseguirlo. El emperador consiguió ganarse su voluntad con la fórmula de la monarquía dual. El nacionalismo paneslavo le asestó el golpe de gracia al imperio.
 
Ese tipo de órdenes nunca se dan ante notario. Pero numerosos libros han probado que el llamado complejo militar-industrial norteamericano presionó al presidente Wilson de USA para que su pais entrase en la guerra y a UK y a Francia para que no firmasen una paz de compromiso, sin indemnizaciones, con Alemania. Y que varios grandes bancos anglosajones financiaron y apoyaron a Lenin y a los bolcheviques.
 
Pero no tiene sentido que los anglos apoyasen la desintegracion del Imperio Ruso cuando eran aliados en guerra, ademas se supone que Lenin fue financiado por Alemania astutamente pero el asunto termino por irsele de las manos.
 
Existe un artículo sobre ese asesinato que arroja algo de luz acerca de los posibles motivos. Está en inglés, y aviso, es un poco largo:

“The Austrian and Russian emperors should not dethrone one another and pave the road to revolution.”
Archduke Franz Ferdinand

It was an ordinary, unremarkable visit by a senior leader of the Empire to one of its central cities. And for us, it would not be the slightest bit interesting, if not for one “but.“ As a result of a chain of suspicious accidents and strange coincidences on this day that led to the death of the heir to the Austrian throne, the First World War began …

The fateful day began with a string of peculiarities, and the Austrian heir died as a result of this large number of “accidents“. According to the schedule, the honored guest was supposed to attend a reception at City Hall and then take off on a planned tour of local sights. But as soon as the initial greeting was over, Franz Ferdinand and his wife hopped into an open-roofed car and sped off into town while the bodyguards of the successor of Emperor Franz Joseph I for some reason were left behind at the train station – quite suprising given the rumors of an assassination attempt had spread through town the day before. But no special security measures were taken even after the Serbian (!) envoy to the Austro-Hungarian Empire had warned of a possible attempt on Franz Ferdinand’s life. The chosen date, June 28(*), 1914, was also quite strange. It was on that day in 1389 that the Turkish army defeated Serbia and deprived the Slavs of independence for hundreds of years to ***ow. In 1878, Bosnia and Herzegovina had been occupied by Austria a result of the Russo-Turkish War and was formally annexed by the Hapsburg Empire in 1908. Holding a military holiday on behalf of the new «oppressors» on such a date was bordering on provocation. But the date of the activities was not changed and the Archdukes voyage was not canceled.

The modercade of four cars rolled along a the riverbanks of the Miljacka that were packed of people at a speed of 12 kmh. All was triumphant and festive. Spectators along the banks waved and shouted praise in German and Serbian. One 18-year-old onlooker worked his way to the front of the crowd. When he saw the questioning glance of a policeman, he smiled and asked to be able to see the Archduke’s vehicle and at the same moment threw a package bomb at the car. The driver, seeing suspicious movement in the corner of his eye, slammed on the gas and the bomb bounced off the canvas hood of the first vehicle exploding under the wheels of the second., The bomb was packed with nails: Franz Ferdinand was unhurt, but his wife was slightly scratched on the neck. Twenty people in the crowd were injured and two officers in the heir’s entourage. Nedeljko Gabrynowicz (the young terrorist was called) started to run, but was immediately caught.

Oddly enough, the unsuccessful attack had no effect on the planned agenda of the visit. The mayor of the city read a flowery speech, but Franz Ferdinand could not restrain himself and interrupted

“Mr. Mayor, I came here on a friendly visit and was met with bombs. This is outrageous!“ He then pulled himself together and said “Well, go on!“

By the end of the speech, the archduke had calmed down and a smile returned to his face as he asked the mayor:

“So what do you think, will there be another attempt on my life today?“

The mayor’s response remains unknwn to this day, along with any additional words from the archduke. However, no extra security measures were taken as a result of their conversation ,despite the obvious danger. Moreover, it was decided to ***ow the original schedule of the visit! Picture this: a bomb explodes near the vehicle of the Austrian president, but in the course of a couple of hours he is once again driving peacefully through the city, happily waving his hand at the hand at the jubilant crowd. It is simply impossible. But in Sarajevo, that is exactly what happened.

A line of cars moved along the promenade going in the opposite direction. This time the cars were driving faster. The heir’s wife continued to sit next to him along with the military governor of Bosnia, General Potiorek. A officer with a sabre on his hip stood aboard the left running board. At one point, in the middle of the road the driver of the first car got lost and accidentally turned right onto Franz Joseph street. The general then noticed that they were going the wrong way and sternly shouted at his driver. The driver braked, drove onto the sidewalk and stopped. The whole motorcade was backed up behind him, so he slowly reversed to avoid causing a traffic jam. Moving in this way, the archdukes vehilce came to a stop in front of the “Morits Schiller Delicatessen.“ In that very spot, a 19-year-old terrorist just happened to be sitting, and who was destined to make history. His name was Gavrilo Princip. But the heir’s trapped car didn’t just stop there, it happened to be standing with its right side to the terrorist, the side with no guard on the running board. The heir and his wife had no cover.

Princip drew his revolver and fired two shots at the stationary vehicle. The first bullet hit Sofia, piercing the car’s body and the countess’ tight corset; the second struck the heir to the Austrian throne. Both were killed. Three children agred 10, 12 and 13 years were immediately orphaned. Gabrilo Princip and his accomplice tried to run, but both were quicky caught and severely beaten. They were beaten with fists and feet and even carried a few sword wounds such that Princip’s arm had to be amputated in custody. An investigation was launched almost immediately. The question to be answered at that time was who organized the attack. Here’s the strange part – after showing suspicious negligence in protecting Franz Ferdinand, the Austro-Hungarian justice department showed olympic agility in solving the crime. The investigation took unprecendented speed. Immediately a wave of arrests was made and a clear picture of the crime came to the fore.

Gavrila Princip said that shot the Archduke because the latter was in his eyes, “the embodiment of Austrian imperialism, representative of a great Austrian ideas, worst enemy and oppressor of the Serbian nation.” After a series of interrogations, the crime was fully illuminated: Franz Ferdinand was killed by Serbs – students of the University of Belgrade and members of “Mlada Bosna” (Young Bosnia) who had come from Serbia specifically for this purpose. The organization first appeared in 1912 with the goal of liberating Serbia from the Austrian yoke and creating an independent Serbian state unified with provinces that were occupied by Austria at the time. Behind this terrorist organization a secret group of Serbian nationalists called «the Black Hand» took shape under the leadership of a colonel named Apis …

But the strangely tragic day gives gounds for suspicion that Austro-Hungarian players were involved in the death of the Archduke. In fact, many in the dual empire were unhappy with the possible policies of the future emperor. Married to a Czech, Franz Ferdinand harbored great sympathy for Slavs both inside and outside the empire. He believed that the monarchy would be strengthened by giving rights to the Slavs that would make them equal to the empire’s German and Hungarian citizens. In Budapest and in Vienna itself, such ideas displeased many politicians. In fact, the Slavic areas of the empire included territory administered by the Hungarian monarchy, and if Franz Ferdinands plan came to fruition, Slavs in these areas would recieve autonomy and self-rule. Perhaps this explains the strange behavior of the Austrian security services.

But the simplicity and obviousness of the unfortunate murder of the archduke and his wife is very deceptive. It never crossed the minds of the Austro-Hungarian leadership that the simplicity and obviousness of of the finidngs of the investigation were assembled by the conspirators! By disclosing the details of the crime, the Austrain police were able to show … that they organized it!

Those who stood behind the 18 assassins needed more than the death of Franz Ferdinand himself. In order for the Austrian investigators to get to those who were truly responsible, they would need to capture the assassins alive. Therefore, all of the participants were supplied with poison capsules!

Seeing that they would be unable to escape, Nedeljko Gabrynowicz and Gavril Principle both took their poison. But it didn’t work on either terrorist! This randomness, simple at first glace, is an essential link in the chain of further tragic events! The foresight of the conspirators is stricking: to furnish the assassins with “safe“ poison and time to shoot. The crowd and the proximity of the archduke’s guards on the second opportunity did not give the assassins time to terminate themselves, and so they fell into the hands of the Austrian justice system.

It was on the terrorists’ very words that the entire investigation’s findings were based! If the police had been left with two corpses as opposed to two terrorists in perfect condition, the investigation would have ground to a standstill. But, thanks to the strange poison, the investigators received not just a thread, but a whole rope, with which to unravel the mystery. Who gave the assassins safe poison? Whoever had it in their interests that the Austrians would quickly find the suspects and direct their anger towards Serbia. The Serbs themselves had no interest in the police getting their hands on the terrorists alive – it would only hurt the reputation of Serbia’s leadership. All the Austrian secret service need to do was to poorly guard the dignitaries and «neglect» to cover them at the right time. That was the only contribution they needed to make.
But that is just the tip of the iecberg. The Mlada Bosna members were clearly given the poison from a different organization …

One can postulate the true organizers of the assassination of the Austrain heir by comparing the the ***owing facts:

— whoever directed the inverstigation to quick and obvious conclusions was not only interested in the death of the archduke, but also clearly wanted to use the situation as an excuse to forment conflict;

— those who gave the terrorists safe poison created a pretext for something more than an Austro-Serbian war.

And it is not the Serbs, nor the Austrians! Vienna’s deisre to punish Serbia for malicious activities led to the outbreak of World War I. But let us ask ourselves a simple question: would Serbian organizers of Franz Ferdinand’s death want something greater? Were they looking for a huge and bloody war that would take the lives of millions? Did they want a conflict of THAT SCALE and to fill the Austrians with righteous anger?
It was in the interest of Serbian nationalists and some Hungarian politicians to confine the distruction to the archduke, as an individual. Neither the Serbs or Austrians needed a major war. Serbia wanted to sow discourd in the Austro-Hungarian Empire — not to fight it. Further fighting was sure to erupt. Having initially provided decent resistance to Austrian forces, in 1915, the Serbs were routed. Their army was loaded onto the ships of the Entente allies was evacuated to Greece, leaving their country occupied by their adversary. As a result, the casualty rate among Serbian units was the highest among all the belligerent countries! Austria-Hungary used the assassination as an excuse to crack down on restive Serbia and as a result of the small victorious campaign, by the end of the war the empire ceased to exist, split into several states, and the Hapsburg throne lost forever.

It is no coincidence that Sir Edward Grey, former British foreign minister wrote in his memoirs, “The world will probably never know the whole truth of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand. It appears that we will never have a single person who would know everything there is to know about this murder. “ What secret was the head of British foreign policy referring to? An investigation quickly and easily named the perpetrators. But the British Foreign Office was saying something quite different: within a month of the assassination of the archduke, World War I had begun, a war in which tens of millions would perish. How it happened? Still no one can explain. In the next chapter we will try to understand who needed a war of unprecedented scale?

Episode 3. Assassination in Sarajevo (I) | Oriental Review

To properly evaluate who would benefit from Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s assassination, just look at the results of the First World War. It destroyed Great Britain’s two chief competitors – Russia and Germany. Convinced that Russia was not crushed during the Russo-Japanese War and the carefully planned revolution, London began to prepare a new, much more ambitious project, whose goals were impressive and grandiose. Metal can only be melted at very high temperatures. Likewise, the political map of the time could only be manipulated by a large European war. Only in its flames could the borders of countries and even peoples be changed beyond recognition. To annihilate Russia, the British needed not just a war – a WORLD war would be needed to be able to destroy the hated Russian government. To take down Germany, where there was not an inkling of revolutionary spirit, a war of unprecedented strength would be necessary. Only a total catastrophe could spur the German burghers to despise their beloved kaiser.

The primary goal of the English plan was the destruction of Russia, next in line – Germany. For our age-old enemy, England, the policy was built around one main objective – to prevent the creation of a strong continental power, or, worse still, a strong bloc of powers. A Russo-German Union – that was the English’ worst nightmare. To this end, the main political task of the British became gradually divided into two sequential tasks: to prevent the a Russo-German alliance and force them into mortal combat against one another. But it wouldn’t be so easy. In the early 20th century, there was no dispute between Russia and Germany that could have created grounds for conflict. The two countries were run by royal cousins – Nicholas and Wilhelm, who maintained a good relationship with one another. So why would they suddenly start to fight? For those of us born in the late 20th century – it was Germany, the arrogant aggressor who twice in 100 years brought Russia to the brink of death. The perspective of a Russian before the First World War would be totally different, however. Germany for their country was a traditionally friendly regime with whom Russia had not fought since the Napoleonic Wars exactly 100 years earlier. A significant event would be needed, some sort of circumstance that would allow both countries to forget their long friendship. Therefore, provoking a Russo-German conflict became the main focus of British policy. France had also long sought out this result as a part of its own foreign policy. France could only reclaim Alsace and Lorraine through war, and France could not single-handedly defeat Germany on its own. Who else could fight for the “noble cause” of returning French territory to the bosom of the motherland then crumble and fall to pieces? Russia, of course!

The murder of the Austrian heir was only the final link, the last brick in the plans to incite world conflagration. The work was colossal and meticulous; beginning soon after the Russo-Turkish war, it took nearly ten years. The opponents needed to be set, and then the preparations came to a logical end – lighting the fuse of a future war, a truly WORLD war. And what a more ideal place to begin than the Balkans, with its century-old interplay of political intrigue, conspiracies and war? The death of the ill-fated archduke would be the event that would provoke a war. And it did – scarcely more than a month after Gavrilo Princip fired his shots, Germany declared war on Russia!

It came full circle: England entered into an alliance with Russia in order to prevent our rapprochement with Germany, to organize a terrible war, and destroy the two rivals!

It was the British (and French) secret services who were behind the assassination of Franz Ferdinand:
— It was in Britain’s interest that from a quick investigation into the killing, a clear trail of evidence back to Serbia would emerge;
— It was in Britain’s interest to foment conflict between the Serbians and the Austrians;
— It was in Britain’s interest that Russia (Serbia’s ally) and Germany (Austria-Hungary’s ally) go to war.
According to the British plan, as a result of the war and the outbreak of revolution, Russia was supposed to lose all of its national borders and become a weak republic and end up in complete financial dependence on its “benefactors.” The same sad fate awaited Germany. Gavril Princip’s fatal shot was the opening signal for all these misfortunes …

However, another problem arose during the preparation of the Russo-German confrontation. The Tsarist government still soberly judged its own armed forces and never in its right mind thought it would be mixed up in a war with Germany and its ally Austria-Hungary, i.e. with two superpowers at the same time!

Consequently, in order to implicate Russia in the horrific war, it would need to be persuaded that it had “loyal allies” that would not leave the Tsar in a pinch. It was the same scenario that pulled us into war with Japan but on a larger scale – reassure the Tsarist government and leave it alone with the enemy at the time of real danger. The pre-war events began to develop into this precise scenario. England – our most implacable enemy, drastically changed its position and became our “ally.” At the Anglo-Russian Conventon of 1907, St. Petersburg actually joined the English-French “Entente” alliance (taking its name from the French Entente Cordiale or Cordial Understanding). The Sons of Albion, who had so often made Russian diplomats’ blood boil, who had provoked so many wars to weaken our country became our “ally.” One should have treaded very carefully. However, Nicholas II believed and paid dearly for it, becoming an obedient tool in the hands of his nation’s enemies who came disguised as friends.

England gathered all of its strength to prepare and nurture the future conflict. And behind it loomed the silhouette of another future “ally.” The U.S., having generously funded the Japanese aggression and Russian revolution was not resting on its laurels and was quitely coming onto the scene as well. With America’s arrival, the whole world balance of power would radically change. Earlier it had been the British dog wagging his American Tail, now the tail was beginning to wag the dog.

But perhaps those who concocted the First World War simply failed to understand what the fruit of their labors would be? Why did our “allies” charge so boldly into this conflict? The answer is simple: Not one democratic state was destroyed by World War I. By their nature, states with democratic systems have a more stable structure than monarchies. In a time of global cataclysm a new party comes to power, another government or a new leader, but never a revolution or a major social explosion. Monarchies do not have such a beautiful lightning rod of popular discontent – a simple change of political furniture. No matter what leaders the tsar or kaiser changes in a time of war, he is still responsible for the country. And the hate will lay at the feet of not just an individual – but at the monarchy itself. Changing the tsar is much more difficult than replacing the prime minister. Therefore, because a monarchy cannot change its head of state, the people will rise to change the very form of government. And revolution in a time of war will inevitably lead to defeat.

It was this striking stability of democratic rule during various crises that gave these governments the organizational resolve to stir a global conflict to destroy their monarchical competitors. For this reason, Britain, France and the United States dove headfirst into the confrontation and set it into motion with all of their strength. Just look at the result of WWI: the U.S. lost nothing and made stacks of money through military contracts, growing stronger and stronger. England destroyed its dangerous rivals Russia and Germany and came out of the war slightly weakened. All the same, compared to all the other warring nations, it emerged as an oasis of prosperity. France ended up the worst off among the warmongers. The war ravaged its territory causing great human and economic losses. And yet the French still reached their goal – a reversal of the Franco-Prussian War and the return of the lost provinces! Paris’ nemesis, Germany, lied defeated in the dust and the French army’s heavy losses were nothing more than the cost of removing a dangerous neighbor.

The truth about the Sarajevo assassination team was already known. In each play, every actor has a well defined role: entering the stage, saying his lines and making his gestures. Then the time comes for him to go behind the curtain. And as such, the key witnesses and players in the drama of Franz Ferdinand’s murder all passed into oblivion. Nedeljko Gabrynowicz was the first to leave this world. Gavril Pinciple quietly ***owed him on May 1, 1918, succumbing to tuburculosis in prison like his cohort. They had completed their roles as the young terrorists in two ways: killing the archduke and putting the Austrians on the “right” track. They played according to the script prepared by the military and political organizers of the assassination. Colonel Apis Dmitrievich, the head of the organization of the Serbian nationalists, “the Black Hand,” was fighting honorably on the front of the war they had provoked four years earlier when he was suddenly arrested on the orders of his own government. The important organizer of backstage affairs was now an unnecessary witness: the military court-martialed the intelligence chief of the Serbian general staff, and, without delay, sentenced him to the firing squad.

The “political” organizer of the Sarajevo assassination, Vladimir Gachinovich, also died under mysterious circumstances. He was simultaneously a member of all three organizations suspected of the crime: Young Bosnia, Civil Defense, and Black Hand. He was also the chief ideologist and most influential member of Mlada Bosna, which carried out the terrorist act. It was Gachinovich who gave his contacts in these organizations to Russian revolutionaries, who in turn used them to sieze the opportunity to mount a revolution. Among his friends were socialist Natanson, and social-democrats Martov, Lunacharsky, Radek and Trotsky. The latter even eulogized him after his death, for in August 1917, the strapping young Vladimir Gachinovich suddenly fell ill. It was such an incomprehensible and mysterious disease that Swiss doctors twice (!) operated on him finding nothing. But, later that month Gachinovich died …

The first bullet hit the archduchess in the chest. She only had time to sigh and instantly fell back in her seat.
“The dress … the dress …” she murmured, watching the red stain spread across the white silk.
But it was not her blood. The second bullet lodged in the spine of her husband, passing through the collar of his uniform, hitting an artery in his neck. The heir to the Austrian throne, clutched his neck, but blood continued to spurt through his fingers, soaking his wife’s snow-white dress and his smart blue uniform in seconds.
“Sophie, Sophie, don’t die! Stay alive for our children!” gurgled Franz Ferdinand, turning to his wife.
She was already unable to hear his words, having died almost instantly. At the moment a new portion of his blood was pouring over the covering hands of General Potiorek, who was trying to help the archduke. The heir’s entourage ran to car.
“His neck, hold his neck!” someone shouted hysterically. Nearby a photographer snapped away, having captured nearly every moment of the shooting.
Someone’s fingers pushed in to try and close Franz Ferdinand’s wound, but the blood continued to pour like a river. Closing the carotid artery, even in a calm environemnt is not easy task, but the collar of his uniform was also getting in the way. The archduke did up his uniform very tightly, and with his usual humor had joked in the past, “the tailor has to sew the clothes directly on, otherwise buttons will fly.” Now, on this fateful day his aides desperately tried to undo the stained blue uniform to stop the bleeding. No one had scissors.
General Potiorek came to his senses first.
“To the hospital, fast!” he bellowed at the driver, pulling him out of his shock. The car lurched into motion. In the back seat, Franz Ferdinand was dying in the arms of two aides who struggled in vain to put pressure on the wound. The archduke continued breathing for another 15 minutes after losing consciousness. He then died in the car next to his wife, whose white dress was soaked in the blood of both spouses.
One month later, that blood would fill all of Europe …

Episode 3. Assassination in Sarajevo (II) | Oriental Review
 
El libro La Masoneria Invisible, de Ricardo de la Cierva, informa sobre el apoyo que dieron a los bolcheviques varios grandes bancos anglos, y sobre los posibles motivos del mismo. Cita varios libros en inglés sobre ese tema. Varias multinacionales de esos paises colaboraron con el nuevo régimen soviético en la explotación de las enormes riquezas naturales de la URSS, sobre todo el petróleo. En cambio, Rusia fue un competidor para las multinacionales petroleras anglosajonas antes de la revolución bolchevique.
 
Pero no tiene sentido que los anglos apoyasen la desintegracion del Imperio Ruso cuando eran aliados en guerra, ademas se supone que Lenin fue financiado por Alemania astutamente pero el asunto termino por irsele de las manos.

Gran Bretaña apoyó al Japón en la guerra ruso-japonesa, y en 1914 sólo hacía nueve años de eso. A los británicos no les interesaba que Rusia saliera reforzada de la guerra contra Alemania, más bien la veían como una oportunidad de debilitar a aquella aún más, lo que la llevaría caer en la dominación económica de Gran Bretaña y sus socios.


Además el zar tenía una pésima reputación en el extranjero, debido a su resistencia a los cambios y a la discriminación contra los judíos. Hasta en los países aliados de Rusia era casi tan odiado como el Kaiser.

El que Nicolás II formara parte de la Entente chocaba con la propaganda de los aliados, que presentaba la guerra como un combate entre los países democráticos y las autocracias.

Por eso al producirse la revolución de febrero ninguno de los aliados de Rusia lamentó la caída de Nicolás II. Es más, Wilson, Clemenceau y Lloyd George la celebraron. No les importaba la suerte que corrieran Nicolás y su familia, sólo les interesaba que Rusia no firmara la paz por separado con los imperios centrales.
 
Última edición:
Vamos, que UK y Francia se aliaron con Rusia para evitar que esta se aliase con sus aliados naturales (Prusia, Austria y Bulgaria).

Otra incongruencia es la del Imperio Otomano, de haberse aliado Rusia con los Imperios Centrales esta tendria que luchar codo con codo con su enemigo secular.
 
El libro La Masoneria Invisible, de Ricardo de la Cierva, informa sobre el apoyo que dieron a los bolcheviques varios grandes bancos anglos, y sobre los posibles motivos del mismo. Cita varios libros en inglés sobre ese tema. Varias multinacionales de esos paises colaboraron con el nuevo régimen soviético en la explotación de las enormes riquezas naturales de la URSS, sobre todo el petróleo. En cambio, Rusia fue un competidor para las multinacionales petroleras anglosajonas antes de la revolución bolchevique.

El economista angloamericano Anthony Sutton lo expusó en su libro 'Wall Street y los bolcheviques', publicado en 1974.

Antony C Sutton: Wall Street and the rise of Hitler & communism - YouTube

https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf


Wall_Street_and_Bolsheviks.gif


Viñeta humorística de 1911. Karl Marx es calurosamente recibido en Wall Street por un grupo de magnates entre los que se encuentran John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan y Theodore Roosevelt.
 
Última edición:
Gran Bretaña apoyó al Japón en la guerra ruso-japonesa, y en 1914 sólo hacía nueve años de eso. A los británicos no les interesaba que Rusia saliera reforzada de la guerra contra Alemania, más bien la veían como una oportunidad de debilitar a aquella aún más, lo que la llevaría caer en la dominación económica de Gran Bretaña y sus socios.


Además el zar tenía una pésima reputación en el extranjero, a causa de su resistencia a los cambios y la discriminación contra los judíos. Hasta en los países aliados de Rusia era casi tan odiado como el Kaiser.

El que Nicolás II formara parte de la Entente chocaba con la propaganda de los países aliados, que presentaba la guerra como un combate entre los países democráticos y las autocracias.

Por eso al producirse la revolución de febrero ninguno de los aliados de Rusia lamentó la caída de Nicolás II. Es más, Wilson, Clemenceau y Lloyd George la celebraron. No les importaba la suerte que corrieran Nicolás y su familia, sólo les interesaba que Rusia no firmara la paz por separado con los imperios centrales.

Los británicos no querían que ninguna otra potencia europea empezase a hacerles sombra. Alemania ya se había puesto a su altura (incluso ya tenía una flota lista para rivalizar con la Royal Navy), y Rusia a pesar de sus problemas estaba creciendo mucho, más que cualquier otro país. Algunos economistas vaticinaban que el Imperio Ruso tendría una posición hegemónica en Europa en el plazo de unas tres décadas. Y ya sabemos que los anglos siempre han luchado por impedir el surgimiento de un poder en Europa que les de el sorpasso, y acabe con su influencia...
 
Volver