Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Nota: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
¿De qué era tu grado?Mi TFG fue precisamente sobre este libro y otros del tema, SON sarama ABSOLUTA.
Todo propaganda de la maxima calidad, la autoproclamada elite, justificando su nuevo orden mundial comunista.
Y si no lo ves eres una ameba que no merece ser salvada.
nos avisan por nuestro bien
a la vez que nos lo cuentan claro clarinete
Q> Mr Edenhofer, 50 years ago the Club of Rome published its frightening forecast on the “Limits to Growth”. The report made huge waves, but did it ultimately make a difference?“We should ask people to step up, but we shouldn’t ask too much of them”
Fifty years ago, the Club of Rome published a wake-up call that visualised the finite nature of natural resources for governments and the private sector. What has the report achieved? Climate economist Ottmar Edenhofer takes stock.<br />www.goethe.de
> The report has had a great impact. In the 1970s, it ensured that everyone began talking about the issue of resource scarcity. And it was the first to ask whether the economy needed to be restructured accordingly. Economists rightly criticised the Club of Rome harshly at the time, however, because the model simulations completely ignored the effect of prices. Rising prices leads to the more economical use of resources. This is exactly what has happened.
Q> But clearly not enough. The warnings of the earth’s eminent collapse have not really changed much to date. We are still talking about the climate crisis, the loss of biodiversity, and the efficient use of available resources. Was the alarm call in vain?
> It is not true that we are facing the same problems today. At the time, the Club of Rome emphasised that fossil fuels and exhaustible resources were becoming scarce. Given the atmosphere’s capacity to absorb CO2, we simply have too much coal, oil and natural gas. The Club of Rome did not really focus on the climate crisis and the loss of biodiversity. Even today, this is not foremost in everyone’s minds, and promoting renewable energies alone will not solve the problem. We need to leave most fossil fuel resources and reserves in the ground. Unfortunately, the world continues to rely on coal, so the price of fossil fuels has obviously not gone high enough.
you need the first step to the tras*formation process
and I think that's very important in the next 10 years
fake el bichito + fake Ukraine War
priority number one: we will start to decarbonize our power sector
priority number two: we need an "effective" carbon price
fake PEAK OIL + CO2 tax + CO2 credit
the transformation is so deep and the speed is so high
that we need new tras*formative instruments
the real deal: GREEN PASS / CBDC / UBI
Para saber más sobre esta revolución, podéis leer este artículo del 2016. Son todo cosas chulísimas.
copypasteo sólo dos frases del último párrafo (conclusiones):
The Fourth Industrial Revolution may indeed “robotize” humanity and thus to deprive us of our heart and soul. But it can also lift humanity into a new collective and jovenlandesal consciousness based on a shared sense of destiny.
We should ask people to step up, but we shouldn’t ask too much of them.
Revolution is a spectators sport. The majority will sit in the stands and watch the factions fight. At the end they will choose side with the team that is winning.
Grado en Administracion y Direccion de Empresas, con especial enfasis en la economia, que era lo que me gustaba.¿De qué era tu grado?
¿Qué otros libros desmontaste?
¿Qué calificación te pusieron? (Sin doble intención)
El fascinante club de Roma.Jesuíta.
He belonged the Jesuit Order from 1987 to 1994 and ***owing his novitiate earned a bachelor's degree in Philosophy at the Munich School of Philosophy. During this time he also founded an enterprise in the public health sector and led a humanitarian aid organization in Croatia and Bosnia from 1991 to 1993.Ottmar Edenhofer - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Philosophy and position on climate change
Edenhofer says that his interest in philosophy and economics was influenced by his readings of the works of Henry George,[42] Karl Marx, Max Weber, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and John Dewey.